<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">

<channel rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/">
<title>Pat Says...</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:creator></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-30T20:19:06-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.121" />


<items>
<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/07/yahoo_internal.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/air_travel_secu.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/yes_lipstick_no.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/they_actually_d.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/easing_up.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/bread_pudding.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/10/todays_cnncom_q.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/12/good_service_fr.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/january_2_2007.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/q_hey_mr_presid.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/fisa_review_may.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/03/faded_memories.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/03/time_to_revisit.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/06/made_in_china.html" />
<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/11/hillary_soft_on.html" />
</rdf:Seq>
</items>

</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/07/yahoo_internal.html">
<title>Yahoo! internal security not so great?</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/07/yahoo_internal.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I got a phishing email from somebody wanting to steal my PayPal username and password.  They set up their server on a machine owned by Yahoo.  Being the good internet citizen I try to be, I sent Yahoo! an email to tell them about this security issue, addressing it to their abuse department and attaching the email from the phishers.  They replied with a canned letter explaining that they don't open attachments due to security issues.</p>

<p>I read a couple of things into this...</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Paging Customer Service</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-07-28T12:42:46-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/air_travel_secu.html">
<title>Air Travel Security Hysteria</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/air_travel_secu.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Dear Senator Kennedy:</p>

<p>I listened with dismay as the radio reported that, because of the actions of some Pakistani women flying out of London, US air travelers are no longer being permitted to bring liquids, such as toiletries and cosmetics, aboard aircraft.  </p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>TSA</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-08-10T23:00:00-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/yes_lipstick_no.html">
<title>Yes Lipstick, No Lip Balm</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/yes_lipstick_no.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The TSA has made it clear they will permit airline passengers to carry lipstick; however, they are not allowing passengers to carry lip balm.  This is nothing short of perverse, because lipstick substantially shares ingredients with lip balm.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>TSA</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-08-13T00:20:54-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/they_actually_d.html">
<title>They actually *didn&apos;t* lie to me about shoes today</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/they_actually_d.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>For quite some time, the TSA screeners, assisted by the media, perpetuated the myth that travelers needed to remove their shoes as part of the security screening process.  The screeners internalized this misperception to the point that I've had debates with them over it, despite very clear messages from the TSA's web site that travelers are not required to remove footwear.</p>

<p>Imagine my "surprise" when, yet again, a screener at Boston's Logan International Airport, made this same claim.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>TSA</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-08-13T22:18:23-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/easing_up.html">
<title>Easing Up</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/easing_up.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I'm reading the news reports about the TSA's ban on liquids, and things have gotten better slightly.  They apparently read my comment about lip balm versus lipstick, and now they're allowing lip balm onto planes.  </p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>TSA</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-08-15T18:57:59-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/bread_pudding.html">
<title>Bread Pudding</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/08/bread_pudding.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>When I was in Norfolk, Virginia, I went to a Cuban restaurant named Havana, on Granby Street.  The food there was great across the board, but it was there that I had the absolute best bread pudding ever.  I award it "Best of Bread Puddings", and it's a finalist for my best dessert ever eaten.  </p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Best Of</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-08-26T21:46:04-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/10/todays_cnncom_q.html">
<title>Are schools really the issue in school safety?</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/10/todays_cnncom_q.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Today's CNN.com Quick Vote asks, "Would you be willing to pay higher taxes to fund school safety?"  The question's premise is faulty.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Politics &amp; Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-10-10T11:01:40-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/12/good_service_fr.html">
<title>Good service from Avis</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2006/12/good_service_fr.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I'm actually happy about something for once :-)</p>

<p>I returned a car to Avis at the Philadelphia airport (PHL) last night.  Ten minutes later, I realized that I had left my cell phone in a cup holder, so I went back there to see if they found it.  The checkin folks could very easily have told me to go inside and fill out a form because they were busy, but instead a couple of them looked around, and one of them spent ten minutes finding the car.  I left the lot with my phone and a smile.  Thank you Avis at PHL for this bit of good customer service.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Paging Customer Service</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2006-12-07T17:48:25-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/january_2_2007.html">
<title>TSA Experience: January 2, 2007</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/january_2_2007.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>What would a trip be without a TSA encounter?  Probably more pleasant.</p>

<p>As fate would have it, not only did I forget to remove my plastic zip-top bag of liquid, gel, paste, and wax toiletries from my carry-on bag, but the x-ray screener decided that my portable printer looked threatening enough to have it manually examined.  So, both of my carry-on items were brought over for Linda 08484 to paw through.  She enlisted the help of Eddie, whose badge number I didn't have a chance to memorize.</p>

<p>Horrors.  I attempted bringing a 4.5 ounce tube of Biotene toothpaste onto an airplane, along with an ostensibly oversized container of Gillette gel antiperspirant.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>TSA</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-01-17T12:52:21-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/q_hey_mr_presid.html">
<title>We Don&apos;t Want No Stinkin&apos; Checks and Balances</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/q_hey_mr_presid.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Q: Hey Mr. President, if you like the Terrorist Surveillance Program so much, why are you not going to seek to renew it?</p>

<p>A: Because I don't want it subject to judicial review.  </p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Politics &amp; Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-01-17T15:23:41-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/fisa_review_may.html">
<title>FISA Review Maybe Not Such A Rosy Development?</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/01/fisa_review_may.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Boston Globe published an article with more detail about the FISA court oversight of the president's Terrorist Surveillance Program today.  The experts and congressional leaders are questioning the nature of this oversight, and whether the court has provided any type of blanket authorization for wiretaps and such, or if it will continue reviewing requests on an individual basis.  The Globe article also makes no mention of the president stating he will not renew the program in light of the new oversight.  Gotta love developing news, and I can't wait to see what happens next on this.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Politics &amp; Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-01-18T10:39:40-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/03/faded_memories.html">
<title>Faded Memories</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/03/faded_memories.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>CD-R has a 75-year lifetime!  Use 'em for backups!  Put your photo collections on 'em!  You'll lose your memory before they lose theirs!</p>

<p>Not Quite.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Technitiae</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-03-14T21:47:12-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/03/time_to_revisit.html">
<title>Time to Revisit the National Security Letter</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/03/time_to_revisit.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>We've got an item that I can't categorize today.  It's either an "I told you so" or "That was the obvious outcome".</p>

<p>It seems that the FBI has misused its privilege of issuing <em>National Security Letters</em> to obtain information kept by banks, ISPs, libraries, etc. about individuals.  Congress is unhappy.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Politics &amp; Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-03-21T12:49:27-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/06/made_in_china.html">
<title>Made In China</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/06/made_in_china.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Is it time for a ban of Chinese food products for people and animals?</p>

<p>Diethylene Glycol has now been found in toothpaste made in China and shipped to the US.  Unlike the melamine found in gluten for animal feed, toothpaste is intended for human consumption.  And like the melamine, diethylene glycol is poisonous.</p>

<p>What gives?  Why are the Chinese putting poisons into food products?</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Politics &amp; Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-06-28T19:22:10-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/11/hillary_soft_on.html">
<title>Hillary Soft on Terrorism</title>
<link>http://blog.epat.us/pat/archives/2007/11/hillary_soft_on.html</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Today Hillary Clinton's campaign headquarters were raided by a hostage taker who demanded to talk to Hillary.  Fortunately he finally surrendered without anybody getting hurt.</p>

<p>These events underscore that it could be foolish to elect Hillary as president.  If she can't secure her own campaign headquarters, how can she protect the WHOLE COUNTRY from terrorism?</p>

<p>I'm kidding, of course, but I wanted you to hear it here first.</p>]]></description>
<dc:subject>Politics &amp; Policy</dc:subject>
<dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-11-30T20:19:06-05:00</dc:date>
</item>


</rdf:RDF>
